On Thursday, as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry began his 10th visit to the region in pursuit of a peace deal, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered a gloomy assessment of peace prospects with the Palestinians.
“There is a growing doubt in Israel that the Palestinians are committed to peace,” Netanyahu said, speaking with Kerry at his side and accusing Palestinian officials of orchestrating a campaign of “rampant” incitement against Israel. He specifically criticized Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for the heroes’ welcome he gave a group of Palestinian prisoners, most convicted of murdering Israelis, who were released from Israeli jails on Tuesday. “To glorify the murderers of innocent women and men as heroes is an outrage,” he said.
The prisoner release was arranged as part of last year’s U.S. brokered package to revive talks. In the days before Kerry’s latest trip to Jerusalem, Palestinian leaders have likewise accused Israel of trying to sabotage the talks aimed at ending their decades-old conflict.
Kerry focused his remarks on a continued U.S. push toward a final peace agreement which Washington hopes to achieve by the end of April and his shorter-term pursuit of a framework deal that would pave the way for a permanent accord. He said Israeli and Palestinian leaders were nearing the point, or were already at it, where they would have to make tough decision, and he pledged to work with both sides more intensely to try to narrow differences on a framework agreement.
Guidelines for such an accord would address core issues such as the borders of a future Palestinian state, security, Palestinian refugees and the status of Jerusalem, Kerry said. “It would create the fixed, defined parameters by which the parties would then know where they are going and what the end result can be,” he said. “This will take time and it will take compromise from both sides, but an agreed framework would be a significant breakthrough.” Kerry seems to be trying to get both sides to make a series of compromises on the broad outlines of an agreement with details to be filled in later which is a tall order in that neither may wish to make such tradeoffs without seeing the fine print.
On many key issues, both sides have sounded far apart. Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Zeev Elkin rejected the creation of a Palestinian state based on the lines pre-dating the 1967 Six-Day War in which Israel captured and occupied Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank. “The Jordan Valley must be under Israeli sovereignty forever,” he said.
“The 1967 borders are Auschwitz borders,” Ha’aretz newspaper quoted him as saying, suggesting that a return to the narrower boundaries that existed before the conflict would lead to the destruction of Israel. On Tuesday, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas renewed a call for all Israeli settlers and soldiers within the lands captured in 1967 to be withdrawn saying he would not hesitate to reject a bad deal. “We will say ‘yes’ to any ideas suggested to us which meet our rights. But we will not fear and will not hesitate for a moment to say ‘no’, whatever the pressure, to any proposal which detracts from or doesn’t fulfill the higher national interests of our people,” he said in a speech.
Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat last month said a framework agreement could allow the talks to continue for another year. However, earlier this week he said the U.S. brokered talks were “failing”, and threatened to haul Israel before the International Criminal Court.
