Recall that yesterday we posted information containing partial emails from several “climate scientists” working with and for the United Nations. An excerpt from one of the emails contained the following:
“I gave up on [Georgia Institute of Technology climate professor] Judith Curry a while ago. I don’t know what she thinks she’s doing, but its not helping the cause,” wrote Mann in another newly released email.
If you don’t remember details of yesterday’s post then you need to travel back and access it and understand the details. You can reach it from here and you need to understand it in order to comprehend why Mann in his statement above was concerned and perhaps puzzled beyond belief.
Just below you will find a heading for Judith Curry’s testimony before a Senate committee in January 2014. Below the heading you will find a link to the 14 pages of Ms. Curry’s testimony with supporting footnotes and a brief biography for Ms. Curry.
I am sure even a cursory examination of her testimony will convince you that in the least, there was substantial, “cooking of the books,” on the part of Mann and his cohorts.
ENJOY
STATEMENT TO THE COMMITTEE ON
ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE
Hearing on Review of the President’s Climate Action Plan
16 January 2014
Judith A. Curry
Georgia Institute of Technology
Climate Forecast Applications Network, LLC
curryja@eas.gatech.edu
Don’t Forget The Related Articles Below:
Related articles
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry message to Climategate’s Michael Mann: ‘You continue to damage the credibility of climate science in ways that you apparently can’t imagine’ ‘Uncertain’ Science: Judith Curry’s Take On Climate Change New Paper At SPPI: Senate Testimony of Dr. Judith Curry The Invisible Judith Curry ‘Uncertain’ Science: Judith Curry’s Take On Climate Change Scientific Smackdown: Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry rips Kerry Emanuel’s response to Pielke Jr. on extreme weather as ‘not convincing to people looking for empirical evidence’ Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry on AAAS report: ‘The authors bypass any scientific explanations, and merely appeal to consensus. They then cite a bunch of catastrophic possibilities, many of which are very unlikely to occur on the timescale of the next c