By Tara Shaver
Albuquerque, NM- With all of the “anti-vaccine” fear propaganda buzzing incessantly, a New Mexico Representative is attempting to legislate medical tyranny by introducing a forced vaccination mandate bill.
Debbie Armstrong (D) from Albuquerque is the sponsor of HB 522, “REMOVE RELIGION IMMUNIZATION EXEMPTION“ which removes the religious exemption from those who choose not vaccinate their children.
(By the way, here is a great article to provide perspective on the current measles discussion.)
We know that the topic of vaccination can be a bit dodgy, especially for those who have children. However, what most people are completely unaware of is that some vaccines actually contain aborted human fetal cells. Yes, you read that right. According to Children of God for Life, there are currently 22 vaccines that contain aborted fetal remains.
There is no “ethical” version of the commonly administered Mumps, Measles and Rubella (MMR) vaccine or the chickenpox vaccine. Also, noteworthy is that the Ebola vaccine that is underway also uses aborted fetal cells. To see the rest of the vaccines and other products using aborted fetal cells click here.
The use of aborted fetal cells in vaccines also has links to the increase in autism, leukemia, and even childhood lymphoma.
Armstrong’s bill will force religious people to use these unethical vaccines which have been directly linked to serious health risks and are derived from aborted children.
We also encourage everyone to do their research and make an informed decision about whether or not to vaccinate. Here is a CDC list of other ingredients that vaccines contain.
We urge everyone to contact the following committee members and urge them to vote in opposition to HB 522.
HB 522 will be in the House Health Committee on Saturday, March 7th so please call email today and stand up for religious freedom and against forced vaccinations that use aborted fetal cells.
House Health Committee
| 505-986-4327 | Rep. Terry H. McMillan: docmcmillan@gmail.com |
| 505-986-4237 | Rep. Kelly K. Fajardo: kelly.fajardo@nmlegis.gov |
| 505-986-4452 | Rep. Gail Chasey: gail@gailchasey.com |
| 505-986-4445 | Rep. Georgene Louis: georgene.louis@nmlegis.gov |
| 505-986-4227 | Rep. James Roger Madalena: james.madalena@nmlegis.gov |
| 505-986-4210 | Rep. Andy Nunez: annunez@zianet.com |
| 505-986-4433 | Rep. Nick L. Salazar |
| 505-986-4782 | Rep. Don L. Tripp: trippsdon@netscape.net |
| 505-986-4250 | Rep. John L. Zimmerman: jzimmer_43@msn.com |
“For government is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, because it does not carry the sword for no reason. For government is God’s servant, an avenger that brings wrath on the one who does wrong.” Romans 13:4
Suggest you folks contact the ACLJ. The bill as written is completely unconstitutional. As the ACLJ told me a few years ago in another similar case: “The case law is clear that limiting religious exemptions based on membership in specific religious denominations with specific tenets violates the Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Other cases also find such statutes to run afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. See, e.g., Boone v. Boozman, 217 F. Supp.2d 938 (E. D. Ark. 2002); Sherr v. Northport-East Northport Union Free School District, 672 F.Supp. 81 (E. D. N. Y. 1987); Dalli v. Board of Education, 267 N. E. 2d 219 (Mass. 1971);Bowden v. lona Grammar School, 726 NYS 2d 685 (App. Ct. 2001); and, Berg v. Glen Cove CitySch. Dist., 853 F. Supp. 651 (E. D. N. Y. 1994). Any law that purports to apply such a limitation in a religious exemption could be successfully challenged and enjoined in federal court.”