 |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
From Dr. Jim Denison:
Attacks on Amy Coney Barrett have begunIn a radio interview this week over my new book on civility, I was asked this honest question: Why should Christians try to engage a culture that so clearly rejects us and our values? A case in point is the furor already circling President Trump’s possible nomination tomorrow of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. One accusation is that she was a member of a religious group that inspired the dystopian novel The Handmaid’s Tale. (This claim has been debunked repeatedly but persists online.) Other attacks are forming around her Catholic beliefs regarding moral issues, as occurred during her confirmation hearings for the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in 2017. Whether you are a Democrat, Republican, or independent, and whether you are a Catholic or a Protestant, you should be concerned about antagonism toward a candidate’s personal faith. Such attacks clearly violate the Constitution’s guarantee that “no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States” (Article VI, Clause 3). And they illustrate the fact that Christian faith commitments are increasingly countercultural. Assuming Judge Barrett is the nominee, it will be important to watch the degree to which her personal faith becomes a focus of attack in the coming weeks. If it does, we should compare the way her faith is treated with the media’s approach to Joe Biden’s Catholic faith. How to “survive tragedy and trauma”Given the animosity of these days, the interviewer’s question is relevant: Why try to engage with such an antagonistic culture? I’d like to offer two biblical answers. One: We are called by God to take his word to the world, regardless of how the world responds. You know the Great Commission to “make disciples of all nations” (Matthew 28:19). Jesus did not limit our commission to nations that welcome our witness. Rather, our mission is as relevant in China as it is in Canada. We are as called to North Korea as we are to South Korea. God measures success not by outcomes but by obedience. |
 |
|
Two: Responding to adversity with hope is best for the world, but also for us. You and I are God’s salt of the earth and light of the world (Matthew 5:13–16). However, what our Lord does through us he also does in us. Being proactively gracious positions us to experience grace even as we share grace. In Jonathan Sacks’ magisterial Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times, he describes conversations with a number of Holocaust survivors. He notes: “They were among the strongest, most life-affirming people I have ever met. For years I wondered how they were able to survive all, having seen what they saw and known what they knew. They had lived through the deepest darkness ever to have descended on a civilization. “Eventually I realized how they had done it. Almost without exception, when the war was over, they focused with single-minded intensity on the future. Strangers in a strange land, they built homes and careers, married and had children, and brought new life into the world.” Consequently, here is his advice: “To survive tragedy and trauma, first build the future. Only then, remember the past.” |
 |
|
From gathering tomorrow for a prayer march and a prayer event in Washington, DC, to making a highly anticipated movie about the resurrection of Jesus, to responding to wildfires with resources and intercession, Christians are taking hope to a desperate world. How will you join them today? NOTE: Has our culture lost the art of civility? That’s a central question in my latest book, Respectfully, I Disagree: How to Be a Civil Person in an Uncivil Time. If you believe that our culture would benefit from more civil discourse, please request my newest book today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To print or download today’s Daily Article as text only, Did someone forward this email to you? |
 |
